Integrate limits usage and exchange workspace #23
No files matched your search
@@ -184,3 +184,14 @@ Documentation only; no runtime tests were run.
|
|||||||
- Validation passed: all 91 frontend tests, analyze app and sxchnge_kyc,
|
- Validation passed: all 91 frontend tests, analyze app and sxchnge_kyc,
|
||||||
format check of all 9 affected Dart files, web build and diff checks.
|
format check of all 9 affected Dart files, web build and diff checks.
|
||||||
- Delivery: [PR #23](https://git.sendico.io/tech/sxchnge/pulls/23), unmerged. Merge #21 first and retarget #23 to main.
|
- Delivery: [PR #23](https://git.sendico.io/tech/sxchnge/pulls/23), unmerged. Merge #21 first and retarget #23 to main.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## UX simplicity preference
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Task [#26](https://git.sendico.io/tech/sxchnge/issues/26), delivered in
|
||||||
|
[PR #27](https://git.sendico.io/tech/sxchnge/pulls/27) on `skills-26`, makes
|
||||||
|
simplicity an explicit preference in the UX Design skill and its review checklist.
|
||||||
|
Prefer fewer concepts, choices, and controls when they serve the same need; retain
|
||||||
|
essential information, accessibility, and recovery. Documentation only.
|
||||||
|
Validation: skill-creator `quick_validate.py` passed in an isolated environment
|
||||||
|
with PyYAML (the system Python lacked it); `git diff --check` passed. No runtime
|
||||||
|
tests were needed. The PR is not merged.
|
||||||
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ before reporting it complete. Rendering correctly is only one part of completion
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Establish the flow
|
## Establish the flow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Prefer the simplest interface that lets users complete their task confidently.
|
||||||
|
When options meet the same need, choose fewer concepts, choices, and controls.
|
||||||
|
Add complexity only for a concrete user need; preserve essential information,
|
||||||
|
accessibility, and recovery rather than hiding them to make a screen look minimal.
|
||||||
- Identify the user's primary task, successful outcome, and shortest appropriate
|
- Identify the user's primary task, successful outcome, and shortest appropriate
|
||||||
path to that outcome before choosing layouts or controls.
|
path to that outcome before choosing layouts or controls.
|
||||||
- Inspect comparable product flows, components, navigation, terminology, and
|
- Inspect comparable product flows, components, navigation, terminology, and
|
||||||
@@ -95,6 +99,8 @@ performed and any gaps; do not mark applicable unmet criteria as complete.
|
|||||||
- [ ] Are interactive elements recognizable, and can the user tell what is
|
- [ ] Are interactive elements recognizable, and can the user tell what is
|
||||||
happening and what will happen next?
|
happening and what will happen next?
|
||||||
- [ ] Are steps appropriate, with unnecessary interaction and cognitive load removed?
|
- [ ] Are steps appropriate, with unnecessary interaction and cognitive load removed?
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Is this the simplest usable solution, with each added concept, choice, or
|
||||||
|
control serving a concrete user need?
|
||||||
- [ ] Does the flow follow existing product patterns and consistent terminology,
|
- [ ] Does the flow follow existing product patterns and consistent terminology,
|
||||||
with a concrete reason for any departure?
|
with a concrete reason for any departure?
|
||||||
- [ ] Can users recover from errors, with input and context preserved where appropriate?
|
- [ ] Can users recover from errors, with input and context preserved where appropriate?
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user